Upgrade your Microsoft DNS to BlueCat
Outgrown Microsoft DNS? BlueCat has all the features you need in an enterprise DDI solution. Better still, BlueCat has a proven migration process designed to minimize disruption to the network.
Beat SLAs with Adaptive Apps & Plugins
A service-level agreement (SLA) sets expectations for what a customer prospects they’ll be receiving from a service provider. In this 30 second feature, explore three add-ons that you can tailor for Adaptive DNS to exceed these expectations. Improve visibility and IT ticket fulfilment across your enterprise using plugins, Cloud resources, or the BlueCat ServiceNow integration to provide fully automated updates.
Symptoms of a system weighed down by Microsoft DNS
What are the symptoms of a system weighed down by Microsoft DNS issues? These charts detail some of the issues customers see when they might be ready to migrate away from Microsoft DNS.
Issues for DNS:
DNS Issue | Caused By | Impact |
---|---|---|
Hidden zones | Inconsistent query paths | Traveling users suffer a loss of access to important services |
Delayed DNS zone synchronization | Setting up secondaries but failing to enable notifications for those secondaries | Some internal locations or customers can see the modified/new record, and others are still receiving the wrong answer |
Delegations reference missing glue records | Misconfiguration, stale data, and decommissioned hardware | Service outages caused by failure to update all instances of a delegation target |
Stale DDNS host and PTR records | Misconfigured, broken, or unused MS DNS scavenging and allowing company-wide DNS self-registration | Visual inspection becomes impossible because of a huge, cluttered list of stale DNS records |
Issues for DHCP:
DHCP Issue | Caused By | Impact |
---|---|---|
DHCP reservations with invalid MAC addresses | Bad data entry | Inaccurate IP address data; confusion as to why the device has the wrong IP address or it no longer exists |
Fake DHCP reservations | Manually misconfigured DHCP ranges | Inaccurate IP address data; inability to know if it’s safe to allocate the IP address |
Unreachable gateway | Bad data entry | DHCP outages |
Conflicting scopes between servers | DHCP services moved without cleanup or creation of backup server | IP address conflicts caused by dueling DHCP servers; DHCP reservations and DHCP option changes don’t take effect or stop working; DHCP pool exhaustion |
Issues for IP address management (IPAM):
IPAM Issue | Caused By | Impact |
---|---|---|
Microsoft IPAM networks conflict with DHCP data | Bad data entry | Misconfiguration of routing tables; overlapping IP address space inaccessible by DHCP clients due to netmask errors |
DNS data references unknown private networks | No single source of truth—each group or BU tracks networks in a different way | Impossible to properly provision networks and wasted IP space, network equipment, and under-utilized servers |
Static and DHCP-reserved IP addresses within active DHCP scopes | Bad practice from Microsoft requirement in early versions of their DHCP service | Unintentional reduction in DHCP pool size; increased risk of surprise DHCP pool exhaustion; risk of DHCP conflicts |
Stale IPAM data and lack of input restrictions | Legacy networks from sold-off divisions or old work sites | Unnecessary purchase of additional network hardware; vulnerable services present on the production network |